New grads and people without much past experience have a really hard time getting jobs. Having been one of the founding engineers at a tech recruiting company where I worked on data-science, I’ve had the opportunity to see actual numbers and the picture can be pretty glum. He had spent hours poring over job boards, sending out cover letters, and had heard back from exactly zero companies. The other day, a friend who was getting ready to graduate from college asked me for advice on how to get a developer job. Not only is it a great way to learn a lot of different coding skills really quickly, it’s also a lot of fun! The paradox: you need a job to get experience but you need experience to get a job… What is widely recognised is that on-the-job training, when done well, provides both the task and the context, and the learning achieved is often more powerful than other approaches.I got into Silicon Valley’s tech scene through the back door - by building my career with simple, quick freelance gigs. Equally some think it is cheaper, but when you factor in the cost of a manager coaching (or training) one-on-one, the reduction in productivity of the individual and manager, the hidden costs can be greater than some off-the-job solutions. Training on-the-job can take longer due to “business as usual” or other work place disturbances, telephone, email, noise, distractions from other people. It is often assumed that training on-the-job is quicker (and cheaper) than training off-the-job. It is training that takes place in the workplace, but training none the less. On-the-job learning is not a short cut, or a cost cutting method, but a different vehicle for developing and growing people and their skills. They assume that on-the-job learning is doing a new task without support or often detailed guidance, almost as though they expect people to learn through osmosis! This is where many managers make mistakes. It is the place and time that the training or learning activity occurs, not the learning process. This is where learning a new skill or process happens within the normal work environment. If we want our people to learn specific things, then relying on “trial and error” is not an effective method for either party. Learning is something that individuals achieve as the result of an experience, not something we do TO people. Is a powerful, but basic training technique that many of us forget to do. Now off you go (when I have seen you be successful, and you agree you are ok, I leave you to it, but come back if you are not sure).You do it with me (let me see what you got & if I need to repeat the first 2 steps).If the task is a skill or activity based one, the old skills training approach of: Often managers believe they have given guidance, but fail to follow a basic coaching or training process which can make all the difference and accelerate the learning process. We do learn from experiences, but is the “learning” that the individual gets and interprets what the manager or leader wants?ĭoing a new task or activity without direct support, training or guidance can be painful for the “learner” and frustrating for the leader or manager. We often hear of managers using “ on-the-job training” as a preferred training approach.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |